Cookie Fonster Annotates Eurovision 1991: Possibly the Most Controversial Year

Intro Post

< 1990 Review | 1991 Review | 1992 Review >

Introduction

Here’s something that I think is important when picking Eurovision hosts: they should be properly fluent in multiple languages. There’s a difference between being able to speak a language and being fluent in it. For instance, I would say that I am fluent in English and German, whereas I can speak French but am not fluent in it. Lill Lindfors (1985) and Åse Kleveland (1986) both did a fantastic job presenting in multiple languages—Lill in six to my memory, Åse only in two.

Unfortunately, RAI (the Italian broadcaster) seemed more interested in showing off their winners than picking qualified presenters. They chose both of Italy’s previous winners: Gigliola Cinquetti and Toto Cutugno. They presented the contest almost entirely in Italian and when they had to speak other languages, they were very clumsy and stilted. They even put as much Italian as they could into the voting, even though the votes could only be given in English or French.

This isn’t the only way the contest reeked of self-indulgence. Both presenters sang their winning songs at the start* and the postcards featured each contestant singing an Italian song. I actually like that the postcards focus on the country’s music rather than scenery, but they were still overly eager to showcase Italy.

I’ll keep the rest brief, or else this introduction would go on way too long. Host city: Rome, Italy (was originally going to be Sanremo). Country count: 22. Returning country: Malta, because the Netherlands skipped. Winner: Sweden, although France tied numerically. Commentary: British.** Voting mishaps: Tons. Presenting mishaps: Plenty. Controversies caused by the winner: You bet.

* The duet rendition of “Non ho l’età” is actually rather nice.

** The only upload of British commentary I could find was on archive.org and stretched to a 16:9 aspect ratio, which drives me crazy. So crazy, in fact, that I made my own video file putting the British audio over unstretched footage of the Belgian Dutch commentary. It took hours to export.

Continue reading

Cookie Fonster Investigates Eurovision 1969: The Notorious Quadruple Tie

Intro Post

< 1968 Review | 1969 Review | 1970 Review >


Introduction

We’ve now reached the year my mother was born in! I can imagine her as a baby to get a feel for how long ago this contest was. Eurovision 1969 was the only contest hosted in Spain and the first hosted in a city I’ve been to: Madrid. The count of Eurovisions hosted in cities I’ve visited is anywhere from four to eight, depending on what you count. I’ve been to Madrid, Paris, Munich, and Lisbon; Brighton and Athens too, but only as a baby; and I’ve transferred at airports in Amsterdam and Düsseldorf. Counting all of these, I could increase the number to 14 if I ever visit Dublin.

This contest had 16 countries, since Austria skipped it this time. After a rapid increase in contestants in the first decade, it must have been disappointing when countries started skipping out. Except for people who hated Eurovision and thought it was the stupidest thing ever; they probably found it satisfying.

The most notable part about this contest is that four countries tied for the winner: the United Kingdom, Spain, France, and the Netherlands. I imagine that the people running Eurovision must have been embarrassed that they never made a tiebreaker rule, which they did next year. Luckily, there were just enough medals to give to the winners. Normally one medal went to the winning singer, and up to three medals went to the winning songwriters; this time, each medal went to a winning singer. The four-way win was so controversial that four more countries skipped out in 1970.

A few other facts: Madrid was the southernmost and westernmost host city at the time. It was the first Eurovision broadcast in the Americas; according to the presenter, Chile, Puerto Rico, and Brazil. The promotional material was designed by a name everyone knows: Salvador Dali. That sounds crazy to me, but is it any crazier than ABBA being from Eurovision?

Fittingly, I watched this contest with commentary in Spanish. This should be a fun way to test how well I know the language, after learning it on and off for a year.

Continue reading