Tag Archives: eurovision

When is my Eurovision 1975 review coming out?

Posted on by
Reply

It’s been a week since I released my review of Eurovision 1974, although before then, no Eurovision review has taken me more than four days to release. What’s the holdup, you might ask?

Every time I have done a blog post series, the first few months are a frenzy of releasing posts super fast. After that, my output simmers as I start to put more thought into each post. And that’s basically what’s happened with my Eurovision posts. After my 1974 review, I paused to work on other projects, then started writing my 1975 review yesterday. As of this writing, I’ve reviewed 7 songs out of 19. Hopefully it’ll be out in the next few days.

Cookie Fonster Plows Through Eurovision 1974: The Most Famous Contestant Ever

Posted on by
4

Intro Post

< 1973 Review | 1974 Review | 1975 Review >

Today, Malmö was confirmed as the host city for Eurovision 2024, matching the host city after last time Loreen won. Since it’s at the southern tip of Sweden, it’s a convenient location for people in nearby countries like Denmark and Germany.

Introduction

Aside from the victory of Sweden’s ABBA, one of the most famous bands in the history of the world, what else is notable about Eurovision 1974? Quite a few things.

Because Luxembourg declined to host twice in a row, it took place in the city where I was born: Brighton, England. I have not been there since I was a baby. The contest happened to be in the year my father was born. If those coincidences weren’t crazy enough, I was born in a year where Sweden won with an upbeat pop song in swing rhythm and major key too (1999).

This contest is one of only two that France skipped, because their president Georges Pompidou had recently died. This also meant Anne-Marie David, the previous winner, couldn’t give ABBA their prize; the BBC director Charles Curran did so instead. France did have a song ready, and I’ll review it as a bonus. This is far from the only year where a country selected a song but then withdrew. I view those withdrawn songs similarly to the canceled 2020 contest—they’re the “what could have been” of Eurovision history.

Greece made its debut in this contest this year. The country has a reputation for embracing its ethnic music in Eurovision, but not quite as much in recent years. They’ve won the contest only once, in 2005, and their best results after that were three third places.

The voting system returned to each jury distributing ten points between each country, but only for one year. 1975 would bring us a system closer to what we know today. I watched the contest with commentary in German, from the non-participating Austria. Because there was no Austrian jury, the commentator offered for viewers to pick their own favorite via phone. (Also, postcards are back!)

Continue reading →

Cookie Fonster Recounts Eurovision 1973: A Breath of Linguistic Freedom

Posted on by
4

Intro Post

< 1972 Review | 1973 Review | 1974 Review >

Introduction

The 1973 edition of Eurovision was hosted once more in Luxembourg City, this time in the Grand Théâtre de Luxembourg. Unlike other Eurovision contests, the orchestra performers surrounded the singers this year, seated in vertical rows. That, together with the bold 1970’s style font, gave this contest a uniquely charming presentation. This contest had 17 participating countries, since Austria and Malta left from last year and a new country joined. It was the first Eurovision participant outside of Europe (but inside the European Broadcasting Union): Israel.

There’s no two ways about it—Israel is a highly controversial country. I don’t consider myself qualified to talk about political issues, but there are several instances of Israel-related drama in Eurovision that it’ll be hard to avoid discussing. In all my blog posts, I try to keep a neutral tone when discussing controversial topics, and the same will hold for Eurovision drama. Still, with four victories and many other iconic entries, Israel has become an integral part of the contest’s history.

The most notable change from prior contests is that for the first time, the language rule was lifted. Countries could sing in any language they chose for the next four years. Sweden and Finland jumped at the opportunity to sing in English, but Norway went the extra mile and sent a song using almost every participating country’s language. I feel like this change was made for the sake of the Nordic countries, which had a strong English-language music scene. When more non-Nordic countries started singing in English in 1976, the rule was reinstated the next year.

It’s unusually hard to find commentary on this contest because Belgium’s performance is blocked on YouTube everywhere except Belgium. With a VPN, the best I could find was an upload with British commentary, marred with lots of white noise. I watched that in alternation with an uncommentated archive on Mega. This was the first of many Eurovisions commentated on TV by Terry Wogan, who was famous for his deadpan humor. That’s why I wanted to access this contest’s British commentary so badly. I had never even used a VPN before writing this post!

Continue reading →

Cookie Fonster Listens to Eurovision 1972: The Year of Romantic Duets

Posted on by
Reply

Intro Post

< 1971 Review | 1972 Review | 1973 Review >

This time of year, the only real Eurovision updates are countries gradually confirming they’ll join next year (including the ones that were pissed), plus the host city selection. Fans are already speculating on who will win 2024 based on whatever patterns they can scrounge up, a clear sign of this news drought. If you’re following these posts, I hope it’s helping lessen your post-Eurovision depression!

Introduction

Since tiny little Monaco didn’t have any buildings suitable to host Eurovision, the United Kingdom stepped in yet again and brought the 1972 contest to Edinburgh, Scotland. This is the only Eurovision hosted in Scotland, and the only one hosted in a part of the UK other than England. Also related to Celtic nations, it’s the only Eurovision with an entry sung in Irish. It had the same 18 countries as last time and the same “1-5 points per juror” voting system as last time, and this time Luxembourg won. I watched it with German commentary… well, mostly. The upload I found alternated between British and German commentary when the voting began, probably because parts of the German commentary were missing.

Unlike the last two contests, this didn’t have any postcards between songs, just pictures of the singers on the big screen. The cards in 1970 featured the singers in their respective countries, in 1971 tourist destinations in those countries, so maybe the Eurovision staff decided they weren’t doing this time. Clearly, they changed their minds in not too long.

I guess I could give a few additional facts, like “this was the first contest where no songs got the same score” or “this is the first time two winners in a row had the same songwriter” (both true), but then I’d sound like a trivia section on a fanmade wiki, especially on the website known as… shudder… Fandom. Let’s just begin!

Continue reading →

Cookie Fonster Picks Apart Eurovision 1971: The Rise of Vocal Harmonization

Posted on by
2

Intro Post

< 1970 Review | 1971 Review | 1972 Review >

Introduction

Eurovision 1971 was the first of seven hosted in Ireland, and the first of six hosted in Dublin. It had a total of 18 countries, including all that had previously skipped except Denmark, plus a newcomer: the tiny Mediterranean island country of Malta, which wasn’t even independent until 1964. This time, Monaco won for the first and only time.

This contest completely redid the voting system, presumably to appease the countries that were mad about the four-way tie two years ago. This time, every country had a pair of jury members (older and younger than 25 years respectively), who each gave songs 1 to 5 points, and the points were all added up so that every country got no less than 34 points. I think that’s a cumbersome system with the obvious hole that a country could vote others low so that they’d comparatively score higher, but somehow it was in place for three years in a row. Plus, rating anything numerically is dumb because number ratings mean different things to different people.

I didn’t expect the Irish presenter to actually speak Irish at the start! Even though I couldn’t understand it, I could tell it was fluent Irish and not just an English speaker who took two semesters of an Irish class, so that made me smile. She introduced the contest in French as well, then English, then the event commenced.

I watched this contest with German commentary from Austria, and I think that’ll be my default choice. Almost all of the media I watch and conversations I have are in English, so why not use this project to immerse myself in some more German? I may choose commentary in other languages too, depending on my mood and what’s available.

Continue reading →

Cookie Fonster Dives into Eurovision 1970: A Decade’s Shaky Beginning

Posted on by
Reply

Intro Post

< 1969 Review | 1970 Review | 1971 Review >

Introduction

Let me preface this post by saying 1970’s music is the fucking best and you don’t get anything like it these days. It was when people put heart and soul into composing popular music and cared about making those songs good and not totally dull and repetitive. As I go through this decade, be prepared for me to pop off about songs you probably think are boring, especially if you grew up during the 70’s and took this amazing style of music for granted.

Eurovision 1970 was hosted in Amsterdam, the second host city in the Netherlands, because they were the winning country that hadn’t hosted in the longest. Unfortunately, the four-way victory last year meant that Portugal, Norway, Sweden, and Finland skipped out due to protest, and Austria and Denmark continued to skip out. This brought the contest to a new low of 12 countries, the fewest since 1959, with no returning artists from prior years. There’s a silver lining to this decrease in participants: to increase the contest’s runtime, every song was preceded by a charming little postcard video, a Eurovision tradition to this day.

With Ireland’s first of seven victories, this contest began a streak from 1970 to 1977 where every winning song was in English or French, which included the four years without the language rule. The 80’s varied the winners’ languages more, but the 90’s had so much bias towards English that the language rule ended entirely. Some countries still voluntarily uphold the language rule, and I get sad whenever I remember Germany doesn’t.

This contest began with a four-minute video showcasing streets and buildings in the Netherlands, then a hilariously short introduction from the presenter. She basically just said “good evening and welcome to Eurovision 1970” in French, English, and Dutch. It was so brief that it felt jarring.

I watched this contest with Ireland’s commentary in English, done by Valerie McGovern. As far as I know, Eurovision has never been commentated in Irish.

Continue reading →

Cookie Fonster Investigates Eurovision 1969: The Notorious Quadruple Tie

Posted on by
Reply

Intro Post

< 1968 Review | 1969 Review | 1970 Review >

Introduction

We’ve now reached the year my mother was born in! I can imagine her as a baby to get a feel for how long ago this contest was. Eurovision 1969 was the only contest hosted in Spain and the first hosted in a city I’ve been to: Madrid. The count of Eurovisions hosted in cities I’ve visited is anywhere from four to eight, depending on what you count. I’ve been to Madrid, Paris, Munich, and Lisbon; Brighton and Athens too, but only as a baby; and I’ve transferred at airports in Amsterdam and Düsseldorf. Counting all of these, I could increase the number to 14 if I ever visit Dublin.

This contest had 16 countries, since Austria skipped it this time. After a rapid increase in contestants in the first decade, it must have been disappointing when countries started skipping out. Except for people who hated Eurovision and thought it was the stupidest thing ever; they probably found it satisfying.

The most notable part about this contest is that four countries tied for the winner: the United Kingdom, Spain, France, and the Netherlands. I imagine that the people running Eurovision must have been embarrassed that they never made a tiebreaker rule, which they did next year. Luckily, there were just enough medals to give to the winners. Normally one medal went to the winning singer, and up to three medals went to the winning songwriters; this time, each medal went to a winning singer. The four-way win was so controversial that four more countries skipped out in 1970.

A few other facts: Madrid was the southernmost and westernmost host city at the time. It was the first Eurovision broadcast in the Americas; according to the presenter, Chile, Puerto Rico, and Brazil. The promotional material was designed by a name everyone knows: Salvador Dali. That sounds crazy to me, but is it any crazier than ABBA being from Eurovision?

Fittingly, I watched this contest with commentary in Spanish. This should be a fun way to test how well I know the language, after learning it on and off for a year.

Continue reading →

Cookie Fonster Scrutinizes Eurovision 1968: Finally Broadcast in Color!

Posted on by
6

Intro Post

< 1967 Review | 1968 Review | 1969 Review >

Introduction

Eurovision 1968 was hosted in London, England, in their iconic building, the Royal Albert Hall. It featured the same 17 countries as last year, which was all countries that had ever previously participated except Denmark. Although it was the first Eurovision broadcast in color, most viewers watched it on grayscale TV anyway. This isn’t a problem for people watching the contest half a century later, like me.

Once again, the contest started with an orchestration of “Puppet on a String”, the previous winner. It’s notable for the United Kingdom losing to Spain by only one point, which fans were very salty about. This was Spain’s first of two victories; their second would be part of the joint four-way win next year. Spain has had bad luck with almost winning, but let’s be real: as far as members of the Big Five go, they aren’t doing too bad.

I watched this contest with Norwegian commentary. Surprisingly for a contest hosted in the UK, the English commentary doesn’t seem to be archived anywhere. I found a YouTube upload of the Norwegian commentary with English subtitles, but the subtitles don’t actually translate the commentary and instead talk about the contestants’ careers in retrospect, which I can easily read about online elsewhere. I’ll just make do with what I have.

(This contest’s Swedish commentary has been archived too. Unlike most Eurovision commentary, it was done by a woman.)

Continue reading →

Cookie Fonster Uncovers Eurovision 1967: Catching up with 60’s Pop

Posted on by
3

Intro Post

< 1966 Review | 1967 Review | 1968 Review >

Introduction

The 1967 edition of Eurovision was hosted in Vienna, Austria, in a building that once was a palace for the Habsburg dynasty. Appropriately enough, I watched it with commentary in Austrian German. This contest began a decline in participating countries that lasted until 1970, after which countries started joining again. This time, only Denmark didn’t return from last year, not to rejoin Eurovision until 1978. Because of this, Eurovision 1966 was the last contest to feature every country that had ever previously participated. I wonder how fans felt when more and more countries started to leave? Maybe they were thinking this contest was soon to die, but they were completely wrong.

Normally in this era of Eurovision, the presenter mostly spoke the host country’s language, plus some obligatory introduction in French and English. However, Erica Vaal went the extra mile and announced the introduction in as many languages as she knew: German, French, English, Italian, Spanish, and Russian. Then she apologized in English to all the countries whose languages she didn’t have the time to learn. I found that incredibly cool.

This contest returned to the original voting system where each country had ten votes to distribute across each entry. I’m guessing this was done to mitigate bloc voting, and it worked! For this contest, at least. It also caused a bunch of clumsiness on the scoreboard operators’ part.

Continue reading →

Cookie Fonster Revisits Eurovision 1966: Lightening the Overall Mood

Posted on by
Reply

Intro Post

< 1965 Review | 1966 Review | 1967 Review >

Just a warning: This post turned out a lot longer than I expected! It’s the most detail I’ve gone into about a Eurovision contest to date, and it’ll only get wilder from there.

Introduction

Eurovision 1966 was hosted in Luxembourg in the same building as 1962, the last time Luxembourg hosted. It had the same 18 participating countries as last time. Now that Ireland joined the contest, the interest in new countries had simmered down. Until the explosion of new participants in 1993, only seven more countries would debut; all either island countries or outside of Europe,* except Greece. There may not have been any new countries, but the list of countries it was broadcast in continued to grow. According to the contest’s Luxembourgish presenter, it was shown in the same Eastern Bloc countries as last year, plus Morocco and Romania. This makes it the first Eurovision to be broadcast outside of Europe.

The TV airing of this contest started with a lovely orchestrated arrangement of “Poupée de cire, poupée de son”, the winner last year, which began a common pattern of revisiting the contest’s prior hits at the start. It also began the controversial pattern of bloc voting—countries giving maximum points to their closest cultural neighbors. I’ll have lots to say about this topic when I analyze the voting results over the years. Lastly, it was the first year where the language rule was enforced. Aside from Sweden’s song in English last year, there had been a few songs with verses in English or French, but for the next seven years, non-native languages were limited to brief phrases.

I watched the contest with French commentary this time.

* Yes, I know a small part of Turkey is in Europe.

Continue reading →