Cookie Fonster Re-Investigates Eurovision 1969: The Year That Almost Killed the Contest

Intro Post

< 1968 Review | 1969 Review | 1970 Review >


Introduction

Eurovision 1969 (the year of my mom’s birth) was the most controversial year up to this point, even before the show began. It’s not a controversial year to fans today, unlike Rome 1991 which is still hotly debated among modern fans, but at the time it was very much controversial. There are two big reasons for the controversy: first, that it was hosted in Spain which was at the time a dictatorship ruled by Francisco Franco. Second, the voting sequence had four countries tied for first place, and since there was no tiebreaker rule, the producers decided to make all of them the winner. Many countries were not happy with this decision.

When I did round 1 of my Eurovision blog, I said this was the first Eurovision in a city I’ve been to: Madrid, which is a beautiful city and lots of fun to explore. But now, the oldest Eurovision in a city I’ve been to is Copenhagen 1964. The count of Eurovisions hosted in cities I’ve visited was “anywhere from four to eight” last time, but now that number has increased by eight because I went to Gothenburg (1 contest), Malmö (3), and Copenhagen (3) in 2024, and Basel (1) in 2025. Now the number of Eurovisions where I have visited the host city is anywhere from twelve to sixteen. Sixteen is also the number of competing countries this year, because Austria skipped out. Ostensibly they couldn’t find a representative, but most people believed the real reason was as a protest against Francisco Franco.

Now the contest having four winners is ridiculous for two reasons. First because the EBU should have had a tiebreaker rule, or at least thought of one on the spot. Second because there was one song clearly far better than everything else that should have won outright: “De troubadour” from the Netherlands. The other three winners (Spain, the UK, and France) I remember being likable songs, but not half as good as the Netherlands. There were no nul-pointers this year: Norway landed at the bottom with one point.

The show opens with “Te Deum” on the organ set to a metal sculpture onstage by Amadeo Gabino, then a kickass promotional poster by Salvador Dalí set to an orchestral arrangement of “La la la”. Why did Eurovision have to abolish the orchestral reprises of last year’s winner early on? They were so cool and fun! Then the presenter Laurita Valenzuela comes in to do the show mostly in Spanish. Her diction in Spanish is very clear and quite easy to understand, even with my limited level of Spanish, and she’s a rare presenter who’s more comfortable speaking in French than English. After the intro in Spanish, French, and English, she said “guten Abend” so I thought she was going to give a speech in German, but she just said “good evening” in all the remaining languages.

As with last time, I’ll watch this with Spanish commentary, done by longtime commentator José Luis Uribarri. He last commentated for Spain in 2010 and died two years later.

Continue reading

Cookie Fonster Investigates Eurovision 1969: The Notorious Quadruple Tie

Intro Post

< 1968 Review | 1969 Review | 1970 Review >


Introduction

We’ve now reached the year my mother was born in! I can imagine her as a baby to get a feel for how long ago this contest was. Eurovision 1969 was the only contest hosted in Spain and the first hosted in a city I’ve been to: Madrid. The count of Eurovisions hosted in cities I’ve visited is anywhere from four to eight, depending on what you count. I’ve been to Madrid, Paris, Munich, and Lisbon; Brighton and Athens too, but only as a baby; and I’ve transferred at airports in Amsterdam and Düsseldorf. Counting all of these, I could increase the number to 14 if I ever visit Dublin.

This contest had 16 countries, since Austria skipped it this time. After a rapid increase in contestants in the first decade, it must have been disappointing when countries started skipping out. Except for people who hated Eurovision and thought it was the stupidest thing ever; they probably found it satisfying.

The most notable part about this contest is that four countries tied for the winner: the United Kingdom, Spain, France, and the Netherlands. I imagine that the people running Eurovision must have been embarrassed that they never made a tiebreaker rule, which they did next year. Luckily, there were just enough medals to give to the winners. Normally one medal went to the winning singer, and up to three medals went to the winning songwriters; this time, each medal went to a winning singer. The four-way win was so controversial that four more countries skipped out in 1970.

A few other facts: Madrid was the southernmost and westernmost host city at the time. It was the first Eurovision broadcast in the Americas; according to the presenter, Chile, Puerto Rico, and Brazil. The promotional material was designed by a name everyone knows: Salvador Dali. That sounds crazy to me, but is it any crazier than ABBA being from Eurovision?

Fittingly, I watched this contest with commentary in Spanish. This should be a fun way to test how well I know the language, after learning it on and off for a year.

Continue reading