Cookie Fonster’s Eurovision 1996 Dissertation: An Atmospheric Top Three

Intro Post

< 1995 Review | 1996 Review | 1997 Review >

Last week, I booked flights to Copenhagen in May for ẗhe Eurovision Song Contest 2024! I plan to visit both Copenhagen and Malmö (two very close cities) for the contest, and that’ll be my big trip of 2024. I have no idea whether I’ll get tickets for the contest, but I’ve told it’s worth visiting the host city either way. This will be my first time in both Denmark and Sweden!


Introduction

Eurovision 1996 was Norway’s second time hosting Eurovision, and this time they chose their capital, Oslo. It graciously gave Ireland a one-year break from hosting. This was the second contest to have a semifinal, but it again didn’t have the format we know today. Norway automatically got a slot in the final, but 29 countries—all but one of whom had participated before—competed for the other 22 slots. Their qualifying round was not a televised event, but an audio-only jury selection.

Seven countries were eliminated in the semifinal: Denmark, Hungary, Israel, Romania, Russia, and two that especially hurt: North Macedonia and Germany. North Macedonia wanted to debut this year, but they had to wait till 1998. Germany was eliminated despite sending a fan favorite song, which caused a lot of controversy that I’ll discuss very soon. It also meant there were no more countries with perfect attendance, since Germany was the last. Five countries returned after skipping 1995: Estonia, Finland, the Netherlands, Slovakia, and Switzerland. Ireland won for the seventh and most recent time, and Norway and Sweden were the next highest.

I feel like I should be more surprised that one of the hosts (Morten Harket) is the lead singer of a-ha, the band known for “Take on Me”, but Flo Rida once competed in this contest so anything is possible. The other host (Ingvid Byrn) is a regular old Norwegian TV presenter. The EBU must have realized that hiring two singers as presenters in 1991 wasn’t a great idea.

The postcards had a three-part format: first the singer introduces themselves and sings a song of their choice, then the usual good old Norwegian scenery, and finally a politician from each country wishes the contestant luck in their own language. I’m guessing the organizers had three different ideas for postcards and combined them into one.

This blog post will cover 30 songs: the seven non-qualifiers, then the entries in the contest itself. It’s gonna be a doozy, so you better buckle up. I watched this contest with British commentary.

Continue reading

Cookie Fonster Swoons Over Eurovision 1985: A Dual Veteran Burst of Joy

Intro Post

< 1984 Review | 1985 Review | 1986 Review >

Introduction

When Sweden gets the chance to host Eurovision, it always comes down to three cities: Stockholm, Gothenburg (Göteborg), and Malmö. Stockholm and Malmö got to host it three times each (including the upcoming 2024 contest), but Gothenburg only in 1985. Greece and Israel returned from last year, but the Netherlands and Yugoslavia skipped, which kept the number of participants at 19 and broke the Netherlands’ perfect attendance.

This contest was hosted by an interesting figure: Lill Lindfors, one of Sweden’s two singers of 1966. She performed one of the strangest Swedish entries in Eurovision, “Nygammal vals”. She also has quite a career in comedy, and we’ll see a lot of her sense of humor throughout this contest, including the most famous thing a Eurovision host ever did on stage. The contest began with way more pleasantries than any year prior: Lill Lindfors first sang a pop song, then introduced Lys Assia (the first winner) as the guest of honor, then went on a lot of tangents before the songs began. Eurovision is truly evolving into modernity!

The winners were also a pair of prior contestants: Hanne Krogh and Elisabeth Andreassen, who gave Norway their surprising first victory. The next two highest were Germany and Sweden, so this was a good year for Germanic countries.

I watched this contest with Austrian commentary by a name whose commentary I’ve watched before: Ernst Grissemann. One thing he does that Terry Wogan doesn’t is that he takes the time to explain the lyrics of every song. Terry Wogan usually just translated the song’s title and made quips about it.

Continue reading